▨ cultural history

and betweenness:

"Descartes is one of the first and greatest exemplars of the left hemisphere’s salience in the philosophy of the Enlightenment
[... quoting Levin:] the final ironic twist in the logic of this process of objectification is that it escapes our control, and we ourselves become its victims
[...] Each of these facets of Descartes’s predicament recapitulates the phenomenology of schizophrenia.
[... in schizophrenia] There is a characteristic combination of omnipotence and impotence, of being all there is and yet nothing at all, which again follows from the lack of betweenness with what is, with the shared world of common experience " p. 335

"It is not on the resoundingly obvious fact of Romantic melancholy that I wish to focus, but on the meaning, in hemisphere terms, of the condition. [...] – the difference between wanting and longing.
[...] The first is unidirectional; the second bidirectional – there is a ‘betweenness’" p. 367

"Through his special use of language, particularly linguistic connectors, prepositions and conjunctions, to convey the experience of ‘betweenness’ [...] Wordsworth brings about poetic formulations" p. 375

"Romanticism in fact demonstrates, in a multitude of ways, its affinity for everything we know from the neuropsychological literature about the workings of the right hemisphere.
[...] in its accent on involvement rather than disinterested impartiality; in its preference for the betweenness which is felt across a three-dimensional world, rather than for seeing what is distant as alien, lying in another plane;" p. 380

"If one had to sum up these features of modernism they could probably be reduced to these: an excess of consciousness and an over-explicitness in relation to what needs to remain intuitive and implicit; depersonalisation and alienation from the body and empathic feeling; disruption of context; fragmentation of experience; and the loss of ‘betweenness’." p. 397-9

"the beautiful [is not] confined to art
[...] Our relationship with what is beautiful is different [from desire]. It is more like longing, or love, a betweenness, a reverberative process between the beautiful and our selves, which has no ulterior purpose, no aim in view, and is nonacquisitive " p. 445

"The Aesthetes’ creed of ‘art for art’s sake’ [...] marginalises its relationship with life. In other words it sacrifices the betweenness of art with life" p. 409

more:

See 7x cultural history and either/or